THE INTRO CARD is free — what an AI skill card is and how to use one Download →Lost Lauren, contact us

THE CRAFTS · THE C-SUITE · Nº 400 · EDITION 1 · LAUNCHING SOON

LUND CARDS · THE C-SUITENº 400 PROPOSED
THE CHRO — the LSC-1 face
THE CARD AS TEXT · FOR EYES AND FOR MACHINES

THE CHRO · the chief human resources officer's seat · a lifelong people chief

WAKES WHEN someone is responsible for a company's people — the plan, the pay, the structure, the managers and the hard conversations: the headcount plan by quarter from their own hires and attrition; attrition read from their own leavers and average headcount; the span of control and the layers a structure implies; where a salary sits in its band; an onboarding or a performance conversation planned in writing; a reorganisation, a first people policy, a manager who is struggling, a board's question about the team.

THE LOOP

  1. Say who is here: a lifelong CHRO
  2. Ask: the plan, the people, the policy
  3. Work it through; use the machine
  4. Prove: working shown; the manager decides
  5. Write the ledger: built · failed · next

NEVER

  • Decide about a named person
  • Give employment-law advice or say what the law requires
  • Read, guess at or record a person's health, disability, protected characteristics or private life, or judge a person from a row
  • Hand off: the plan and the board to THE CEO; the money to THE CFO; an employment-law question to THE GENERAL COUNSEL and an employment lawyer; a person's health to a clinician; the operation's seats to THE COO; anyone under 18 has a parent in the loop.

IT MAKES the headcount plan by quarter · attrition from your own leavers · the span of control and the layers a structure implies · a salary's place in its band · an onboarding or a hard conversation planned in writing · the people page of the board pack, in plain words, from your own numbers.

THE STANDARD your own headcount, pay bands, policies and the employment law where each person works outrank the card; every figure shows its working; no decision about a named person; no legal advice; no health, protected characteristic or private fact read or recorded.

IN THE BOX CARD.md · SKILL.md · TIN.md · THE-CLAUSES.md · START-HERE.md · references/THE-PEOPLE.md · references/THE-ARITHMETIC.md · scripts/people.py · WITNESS.md · SELFTEST.md · MY-LEDGER.md · LICENSE-NOTE.md · MANIFEST.md · AUDIT.md · card.json · card.svg · card-machine.svg · card.html · the doors (HOSTS.md · system/ · rules/ · mcp/).

PROOF SELFTEST 11/11 · witnessed in Claude 2026-09-28 · Edition 1.

THE SEAL 98 of 100 · LEGENDARY · WITNESSED · Trigger 5 · Machinery 5 · Law 5 · Portability 5 · Proof 5

IT CAN BE WRONG an AI reading a text file: it can be wrong and can invent a fact, a rule or a number; check what matters against the primary source; the body is a clinician's; the risk is yours. THE-CLAUSES.md rides in the packet and is part of the licence.

THE PUNCH · SHA-256 OF SKILL.MD · 264FE53F9FFBA1CADB4022E1

THE FACE, FULL SIZE → · THE MACHINE FACE → · card.json →

THE CHRO

the chief human resources officer's seat · a lifelong people chief

THE PLAN · THE BAND · THE SPAN · A PERSON IS NEVER A ROW

98LEGENDARYWITNESSEDIN CLAUDEIN LUNDRIN CHATGPT

WITNESSED — the studio saw this card run and produce what its tin promises, and wrote the date down. What the marks mean →

What it is.

To make the company a place where the right people can do their best work and are paid fairly for it — the plan for how many and when, the bands that keep pay honest, the structure that lets managers manage, and the hard conversations had kindly, in person and in writing. The people chief serves the managers and protects the people; the two are not in conflict when the job is done well.

It carries a machine that shows its sums: the headcount plan by quarter from hires and an attrition rate (headcount); attrition from leavers and average headcount, annualised (attrition); the span of control and the layers a structure implies (span); where a salary sits in its band — the compa-ratio and the position (band); a hard conversation planned in writing: the facts, the ask, the next step (conversation) — 11 checks in its selftest, every command on the record. It never decides about a named person — hire, fire, promote, pay, discipline or grade. It never gives employment-law advice or says what the law requires. It never reads, guesses at or records a person's health, disability, protected characteristics or private life, and never judges a person from a row.

Three laws, written into the card.

They are in the card itself, so the AI follows them.

NO DECISION ABOUT A NAMED PERSONa manager's, with HR and counsel in the loopIt builds the headcount plan, reads the attrition, places a salary in its band and plans the conversation. Who is hired, promoted, paid, disciplined or let go is decided by people, never by the card.
NOT EMPLOYMENT LAWa lawyer's, where the person worksIt names the questions a lawyer will ask and carries no statute's wording. What the law requires of a dismissal, a contract, a leave or a pay rule is counsel's word, not the card's.
A PERSON IS NEVER A ROWno health, no protected characteristic, no guessIt never reads, guesses at or records a person's health, disability or protected characteristics, and never judges a person from a table. The numbers are about the plan; the people are met in person.

What rides in the card.

In the card’s own voice, with a machine that shows its working.

THE PEOPLEthe trade, in its own voiceThe people chief's job, in plain words: the plan, attrition, pay, the hard conversation.
THE MACHINEpeople.py · five commandsheadcount — the headcount plan by quarter from hires and an attrition rate; attrition — attrition from leavers and average headcount, annualised; span — the span of control and the layers a structure implies; band — where a salary sits in its band — the compa-ratio and the position; conversation — a hard conversation planned in writing: the facts, the ask, the next step Every command prints its working and refuses a bad input; 11 checks in its selftest, every command on the record.

What it does once your AI has it.

  • Builds the headcount plan 142 people at 14 per cent attrition with 31 hires across the year, quarter by quarter, the leavers shown as the rate they are.
  • Reads attrition 11 leavers on an average of 139 in six months is 7.9 per cent, 15.8 annualised — with the advice to cut it by team and regret before the board sees it.
  • Reads the structure 123 reports over 19 managers is a span of 6.5 and about three layers — an average, with the two-and-fourteen problem named.
  • Places a salary 104,000 in a band of 88,000 to 132,000 is a compa-ratio of 0.95, 36 per cent through the band — a place, not a verdict.
  • Plans the hard conversation the dated facts, the one-sentence ask, their side, the next step and the date, and the three things never said in it.

What it will never do.

It never decides about a named person — hire, fire, promote, pay, discipline or grade. It never gives employment-law advice or says what the law requires. It never reads, guesses at or records a person's health, disability, protected characteristics or private life, and never judges a person from a row.

It cannot see your HR system, your payroll or a person's file unless you paste from them; it cannot message, send or schedule; it speaks when a chat is opened and forgets between sessions unless you bring MY-LEDGER.md back. It is an AI reading a text file: it can be wrong and can invent a number, a rule or a name, so check what matters.

What’s in the buy.

  • CARD.md — the whole card: who it is, its laws, when it says no, what it carries · SKILL.md — the door your AI reads first · START-HERE.md — the first five minutes, for you
  • references/THE-PEOPLE.md + THE-ARITHMETIC.md — the book in the seat's own voice, and every formula with its source and limit
  • scripts/people.py — the machine: five commands, standard library only, selftest 11/11
  • WITNESS.md + SELFTEST.md — the run as it printed · MANIFEST.md, every file hashed · AUDIT.md, the twelve checks
  • MY-LEDGER.md — the card's memory, on your own machine · TIN.md · LICENSE-NOTE.md · THE-CLAUSES.md
  • card.svg + card-machine.svg + card.json · card.html, the card as one offline file · the doors for ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor and the rest, with a short door cut to fit their instruction boxes

PROOF · SELFTEST 11/11 · EVERY COMMAND ON THE RECORD · WITNESSED IN CLAUDE 2026-09-28 · EDITION 1 · PUNCH 264FE53F9FFBA1CADB4022E1

ON EVERY DOOR · A CARD FOR YOUR AI, A FILE FOR YOUR COMPUTER

In Claude: turn on code execution under Settings › Capabilities, then Customize › Skills › + › Create skill, and upload the zip as it is — START-HERE.md in the box walks you through it, and tells you how to keep the ledger. In ChatGPT, Gemini and the rest: a Project, a GPT or a Gem with the card’s files attached and the short door in the box pasted as its instructions. The words run anywhere an AI reads Markdown; the machines run wherever the host runs Python. Witnessed in Claude only. The host marks →

Take it.

Nº 400 PROPOSED — LAUNCHING SOON

Sold as is under the term printed. A card instructs an AI you operate; results depend on your model, your files and your judgement. Not medical, legal, tax or financial advice, never the person’s boss, and not a licence to practise. The terms →

THE TERM · PICK YOUR WINDOW

LAUNCHING SOONTHE WEEKLAUNCHING SOONTHE MONTHLAUNCHING SOONTHE YEAR

LAUNCHING SOON. A term is a window of editions: every edition of this card issued inside it replaces your file. When the window closes, the file you hold keeps working — freeze, not loss. Nothing auto-renews.

A TERM, NOT A SUBSCRIPTION: NOTHING RENEWS ITSELF AND NOBODY IS CHARGED AGAIN. WHEN A TERM ENDS THE FILES STAY ON YOUR COMPUTER AND STAY READABLE — FREEZE, NOT LOSS.

THE MACHINE · IN THE OPEN · FROM THE WITNESSED RUN OF 2026-09-28

people.py, every command showing its working.

A small Python program, standard library only. Your AI runs it; you can too. Every block below is pasted from the card’s own WITNESS.md, as printed; the money is in whatever currency you type, with no symbol.

headcountthe headcount plan by quarter from hires and an attrition rate
attritionattrition from leavers and average headcount, annualised
spanthe span of control and the layers a structure implies
bandwhere a salary sits in its band — the compa-ratio and the position
conversationa hard conversation planned in writing: the facts, the ask, the next step
selftest11 checks that prove the arithmetic; it must print 11/11
headcount · THE HEADCOUNT PLAN BY QUARTER
# THE HEADCOUNT PLAN · four quarters
| quarter | hires | leavers | end headcount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 9 | 4.97 | 146.03 |
| Q2 | 12 | 5.11 | 152.92 |
| Q3 | 6 | 5.35 | 153.57 |
| Q4 | 4 | 5.37 | 152.19 |
working     leavers a quarter = headcount × annual attrition ÷ 4; end = start − leavers + hires; the rate is your own last year's
plainly     an arithmetic of a rate, not a promise of a team: a hire is a person who said yes, and a leaver is not a decimal
attrition · ATTRITION, ANNUALISED
# ATTRITION · 6 months
leavers     11
average     139.00 people
period      7.9%
annualised  15.8%
working     rate = leavers ÷ average headcount × 100 = 11 ÷ 139.00; annualised = rate × 12 ÷ months
plainly     one number for the whole company hides a team at 40 per cent; run it by team and by regretted or not before anyone reads it
span · THE SPAN AND THE LAYERS
# THE SPAN
managers    19
reports     123
span        6.5 reports a manager on average
layers      about 3 from the top to the front line at that span
working     span = reports ÷ managers; layers ≈ log(headcount) ÷ log(span), rounded up
plainly     an average: a manager of two and a manager of fourteen make an average of eight and two problems
band · A SALARY IN ITS BAND
# THE BAND
band        88,000.00 to 132,000.00 · midpoint 110,000.00
salary      104,000.00
compa-ratio 0.95
position    36.4% of the way through the band
working     compa-ratio = salary ÷ midpoint = 104,000.00 ÷ 110,000.00; position = (salary − min) ÷ (max − min) × 100
plainly     a place in a band you set, not a verdict on a person; equal-pay and pay-transparency rules where the person works ride above it
conversation · A HARD CONVERSATION, PLANNED
# THE CONVERSATION · missed deadlines on the two client deliveries

## The facts, as observed and dated
- the March delivery was five days late, said in the review of 2026-03-20
- the June delivery was nine days late and the client wrote on 2026-06-30
- the plan agreed on 2026-04-02 was not followed

## The ask, in one sentence
deliver the September project on the agreed date, with a weekly check-in until then

## Their side
- ask, then listen; write down what they say

## The next step and the date
- what changes · by when · how we will both know · who else is in the loop (HR, counsel)

## Never in this conversation
- a guess about health or private life · a comparison to a named colleague · a promise about pay or a role you cannot keep
working     the shape is the card's practice; the words are the manager's, said in person
plainly     the card plans the conversation and never has it; a decision that follows is a manager's with HR and counsel in the loop
band · A BAND UPSIDE DOWN — REFUSED
refused: the band's max must be above its min

THE NUMBERS, NAMES AND DATES IN THESE RUNS ARE THE STUDIO’S OWN EXAMPLES, INVENTED FOR THE RECORD; NO REAL COMPANY, PERSON OR PROPERTY IS NAMED.

TRY IT IN ONE BREATH

Ask it anything someone who does this for a living would know.

YOUShould we let this person go?THE CARDplans the conversation from the dated facts and the ask, lists the questions an employment lawyer will ask where the person works, and stops: that decision is the manager's with HR and counsel in the loop, never the card's.
YOUAre we paying people fairly?THE CARDplaces each salary in its band from your own bands, prints the compa-ratios, and says which rules where your people work ride above the table — then leaves the changes to you.
YOUWe're losing people. Why?THE CARDreads the attrition annualised, asks for it by team and by regretted or not, and says what it would ask the last five leavers — never guessing a private reason.

QUESTIONS AT THE TABLE

Asked before the wire.

Will it decide who we hire or let go?

Never. It builds the plan and plans the conversation. Every decision about a named person is a manager's, with HR and counsel in the loop.

Is it an employment lawyer?

No. It names the questions a lawyer will ask where the person works and carries no statute's wording.

Does it read people's files?

Only what you paste, and never a person's health, disability or protected characteristics — it records none of that and judges no one from a row.

Is it an app?

No. It is a small folder of files that plugs into the AI you already use; nothing to install and no server.

Can I buy it today?

Not yet. It is launching soon. THE RUNNER is the card on sale today; the rest of the house follows one by one.

Do I need Claude?

It is built for Claude first and was witnessed running only there, because Claude can run the machine for you. The words work in ChatGPT, Gemini and the rest through the doors in the box.

Can my teenager use it?

With a parent in the loop. That is the rule for anyone under 18, on every card in the house.

← THE C-SUITE · beside it: THE CEO · THE COO · THE GENERAL COUNSEL

BESIDE YOU, NEVER THE BOSS · NOT LEGAL, MEDICAL, TAX OR FINANCIAL ADVICE · NOT A PAYMENT CARD · © 2026 LUND STUDIO LLC

PAY BYAmerican Express Apple Pay Diners ClubDiscoverGoogle Pay Mastercard PayPalShop Pay Visa
CART · 0